EDF Mag Blaster optimal DPS Analysis

"x" Subscript, 2 , Baseline	"y" Subscript, 2 , Baseline
0	1	r1c3:
.2 5	.5	r2c3:
.5	.2 5	r3c3:
.7 5	.0 5	r4c3:
		r5c3:

Wyrażenie 11: "y" Subscript, 2 , Baseline tilde left parenthesis, "x" Subscript, 2 , Baseline minus 1 , right parenthesis Superscript, "c" , Baseline

Wyrażenie 12: "f" left parenthesis, "x" , right parenthesis equals StartFraction, Start integral from 0 to "x" , end integral, left parenthesis, "t" minus StartNestedFraction, "m" Subscript, "a" "g" "S" "i" "z" "e" , Baseline NestedOver "r" Subscript, "o" "f" , Baseline , EndNestedFraction , right parenthesis squared "d" "t" Over left parenthesis, "x" plus "r" Subscript, "e" "l" "o" "a" "d" "T" "i" "m" "e" , Baseline , right parenthesis , EndFraction

Once you hit ~73-71% capacity, reload for maximum dps (assuming 3 second reload such as Mag Blaster DX. Reload later if slower reload, reload earlier if faster reload). Probably better to go slightly over. Obviously draining out entirely is best for energy efficiency. Source for rough mag blaster damage stats: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNNkuWwzHN4

Magazine size also has an effect on optimal reload, but much lower effect. larger magazine size needs to reload earlier

Wyrażenie 15: left parenthesis, "x" minus StartFraction, "m" Subscript, "a" "g" "S" "i" "z" "e" , Baseline Over "r" Subscript, "o" "f" , Baseline , EndFraction , right parenthesis squared

Wyrażenie 16: "f" prime left parenthesis, "d" plus StartFraction, "m" Subscript, "a" "g" "S" "i" "z" "e" , Baseline Over 2 "r" Subscript, "o" "f" , Baseline , EndFraction , right parenthesis tilde 0 left brace, StartAbsoluteValue, "d" , EndAbsoluteValue less than or equal to StartFraction, "m" Subscript, "a" "g" "S" "i" "z" "e" , Baseline Over 2 "r" Subscript, "o" "f" , Baseline , EndFraction , right brace

Wyrażenie 17: "d" plus StartFraction, "m" Subscript, "a" "g" "S" "i" "z" "e" , Baseline Over 2 "r" Subscript, "o" "f" , Baseline , EndFraction

equals

6.8 5 3 4 8 7 2 4 2

Wyrażenie 18: "o" Subscript, "p" "t" "i" "m" "a" "l" "R" "e" "l" "o" "a" "d" "P" "o" "i" "n" "t" , Baseline equals "m" Subscript, "a" "g" "S" "i" "z" "e" , Baseline minus "r" Subscript, "o" "f" , Baseline times left parenthesis, "d" plus StartFraction, "m" Subscript, "a" "g" "S" "i" "z" "e" , Baseline Over 2 "r" Subscript, "o" "f" , Baseline , EndFraction , right parenthesis

equals

1060.7 9 0 7 6 5 4 8

I just realized that this technically isn't 100% accurate, but summations are laggy as fuck and a pain in the ass to work with, and this is close enough anyway.

obsługiwane przez