141
142
143
144
Range of the Southern Baltic Sea (SBS) in the case of sea level rise of 65 meters
145
146
147
33 more rows
r1c3:
r2c3:
r3c3:
r4c3:
r5c3:
r6c3:
r7c3:
r41c3:
r42c3:
r43c3:
r44c3:
r45c3:
148
149
150
151
152
153
f16(x) to f15(x)
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
TRANSGRESSION/REGRESSION & EROSION/ACCUMULATION DYNAMICS CALCULATIONS
161
f1(x) to f2(x), 24-20 ka BP
162
163
t = t1 - t2, t = 400 years
164
165
B = 650 000 - 200 000, B = 450 000 m
166
167
Since L -Leszno Phase - 24 ka BP (Marks et al., 2016) ~ f1(x) until Pz - Poznań Phase - 20 - 19 ka BP (Marks et al., 2016) ~ f2(x)
168
169
Averaged pace:
170
171
Since Pz - Poznań Phase - 20 - 19 ka BP (Marks et al., 2016) ~ f2(x)up to Pm - Pomeranian Phase - 17 - 16 ka BP (Marks et al., 2016) ~ f3(x)
172
173
Averaged pace:
174
175
176
Since Pomeranian Phase - 17 - 16 ka BP (Marks, et al., 2016) up to Gardno Phase - 16.8 - 16.6 ka BP (Marks, 2002) ~ f4(x)
177
178
Averaged pace:
179
180
181
Averaged pace:
182
183
"Development dynamics between SB - Słupsk Bank Phase - 16.2 - 15.8 ka BP ~ f5(x), and SMB - Southern Middle Bank Phase - 15.4 - 15.0 ka BP ~ f6(x)"
184
185
Averaged pace:
186
187
Inequalities defining the areas between the successive face of the ice sheet deglaciation phases / coastline locations.
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
Averaged development pace between Southern Middle Bank Phase and Baltic Ice Lake
195
196
197
Averaged development pace between Baltic Ice Lake and Yoldia Sea
198
199
200
Averaged development pace between Yoldia Sea and Ancylus Lake
201
202
203
Averaged development pace between Ancylus Lake and Littorina Sea 2
204
205
206
Averaged development pace between Littorina Sea 2 and Littorina Sea
207
208
209
Averaged development pace between Littorina Sea and current coastline
210
211
Results in the form of an average rate of development dynamics between individual phases.
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
Nested table of the shift dynamics in the time function [m/year].
236
r1c3:
r2c3:
r3c3:
r4c3:
r5c3:
r6c3:
r7c3:
r8c3:
r9c3:
r10c3:
r11c3:
r12c3:
r13c3:
r14c3:
r15c3:
r16c3:
237
Forecast, +6m scenario, when i.e. 90% of the Greenland ice melts down.
238
39 more rows
r1c3:
r2c3:
r3c3:
r4c3:
r5c3:
r6c3:
r7c3:
r47c3:
r48c3:
r49c3:
r50c3:
r51c3:
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
Adjustable time scale, GMSL rise may exceed 5m in ca. 3000 years time according to RCP8.5 scenario (Oppenheimer et al., 2019), or in ca. 4000 years based on 0.15 m rise during last 100 years (mareograph in Gdańsk, IMGW data).
248
249
Forecast of the future morphodynamics rate [m/year] for + 6 m a.s.l. scenario.
250
251
252
253
r1c3:
r2c3:
r3c3:
254
r1c3:
r2c3:
r3c3:
r4c3:
r5c3:
r6c3:
r7c3:
r8c3:
r9c3:
r10c3:
r11c3:
r12c3:
r13c3:
r14c3:
r15c3:
r16c3:
r17c3:
r18c3:
r19c3:
r20c3:
r21c3:
255
256
257
258
Area = [A_JG1 - B_JG1] + [C_JG1 - D_JG1]
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
r1c3:
r2c3:
r3c3:
r4c3:
r5c3:
r6c3:
r7c3:
r8c3:
r9c3:
r10c3:
r11c3:
r12c3:
r13c3:
r14c3:
274
275
276
.
277
.
278
.
279
...as you've reached this far, perhaps you'd find a way to support my further research?
280
₿: 36T8iGKb1acTwEzYh1xVHcBfWrP943asPw
281
ERC20: 0xF15678e75262FCee76e9DAfe6Cf98ee16db5Ebc5
282
283
powered by
powered by
New Blank Graph
Examples